Potere di mercato e controllo dell’opinione pubblica. La valutazione dei rischi per il pluralismo e l’indipendenza editoriale derivanti dalla concentrazione proprietaria

Autori

  • Roberta Carlini

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0228

Parole chiave:

Proprietà, Concentrazione, Pluralismo, Indipendenza editoriale, Potere di mercato, Media plurality test, EMFA

Abstract

In premessa, spieghiamo perché la concentrazione della proprietà dei media conta ancora, anche nell’era digitale, riassumendo la letteratura scientifica e l’evoluzione del dibattito politico in Europa che ha portato all’articolo 22 dell’EMFA (valutazione delle concentrazioni del mercato dei media, il cosiddetto “Media plurality test”). Di seguito argomentiamo le ragioni di un approccio olistico, che vada oltre la normativa a tutela della concorrenza per valutare il più ampio impatto della concentrazione della proprietà dei media sulla formazione dell’opinione pubblica, sulla diversità dell’offerta informativa e sulla indipendenza editoriale (lato offerta), nonché sulla diversità nell’esposizione e accesso ai media (lato domanda). Poi si introducono le parole-chiave e gli indicatori del “Media plurality test”, utilizzando gli strumenti concettuali e i risultati del progetto di ricerca Media Pluralism Monitor per analizzarne criticamente la portata e i criteri, per indagare i potenziali problemi e per discutere la relazione tra le concentrazioni di proprietà e l’indipendenza editoriale. Infine, si evidenziano le principali sfide da affrontare.

Biografia autore

  • Roberta Carlini

    Professoressa assistente a tempo parziale presso il Centro per il pluralismo dei media e la libertà dei media dell'Istituto universitario europeo

Riferimenti bibliografici

S.P. Anderson, B. Julien (2015), The Advertising-Financed Business Model in Two-Sided Media Markets, Handbook of Media Economics, North Holland, vol. 1, 2015

C.E. Baker (2007), Media concentration and democracy: why ownership matters, Cambridge University Press, 2007

M. Baron (2025), Where Jeff Bezos went wrong with The Washington Post, in “The Atlantic”, 3 March 2025

K. Bleyer-Simon, D. Da Costa Leite Borges, E. Brogi et al. (2024), Monitoring media pluralism in the digital era : application of the media pluralism monitor in the European member states and in candidate countries in 2023, EUI, RSC, Research Project Report, Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF), Country Reports, 2024

E. Brogi, D. Da Costa Leite Borges, R. Carlini et al. (2023), The European Media Freedom Act: media freedom, freedom of expression and pluralism, European Parliament, 2023

T. Burman (2025), Donald Trump’s Tech Bro Orbit—How Silicon Valley Merged With MAGA, in “Newsweek”, 13 January 2025

R. Carlini, P.L. Parcu (2024), How article 22 aims to tackle market power in the platformed media environment. A critical test for European media, Blogpost in EMFA Observatory, 18 December 2024

CMPF (2024), Monitoring media pluralism in the digital era: application of the media pluralism monitor in the European member states and in candidate countries in 2023, EUI, 2024

CMPF (2023), Feedback on the proposal for a regulation establishing a common framework for media services in the internal market (European Media Freedom Act) and amending Directive 2010/13/EU, EUI, 2023

G. Doyle (2016), Why ownership pluralism still matters in a multi-platform world, in P. Valcke, M. Sükösd, R.G. Picard (eds.), “Media Pluralism and Diversity: Concepts, Risks and Global Trends”, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016

European Commission - Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology (2022), Study on media plurality and diversity online – Final report, Publications Office of the European Union, 2022

A. Fanta (2024), 25 years ago, Europe failed to curb the power of media moguls. It still haunts us today, The EU files, Follow the Money, 13 January 2024

J. Furman, D. Coyle, A. Fletcher et al. (2019), Unlocking Digital Competition. Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel, 2019

N. Just (2009), Measuring media concentration and diversity: new approaches and instruments in Europe and the US, in “Media, Culture & Society”, vol. 31, 2009, n. 1

K. Karppinen (2013), Rethinking media pluralism, 1st ed., Fordham University Press, 2013

T. Kerševan (2024), From rhetoric to regulation: EMFA and media concentration in the digital age, in “Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto”, 2024, n. 2

A. Manganelli, L. Mariniello (2024), La valutazione delle concentrazioni per la tutela del pluralismo informative, in “Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto”, 2024, n. 2

Y. Montjoye, H. Schweitzer, J. Crémer (2019), Competition policy for the digital era, European Commission, Directorate-General for Competition, 2019

M. Moore, D. Tambini (eds.) (2018), Digital dominance: the power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, Oxford University Press, 2018

C. Mymbs Nice (2025), What Elon Musk is doing to the government, in “The New Yorker”, 26 February 2025

R.K. Nielsen, S.A. Ganter (2022), The power of platforms: shaping media and society, Oxford University Press, 2022

E.M. Noam (2016), Who owns the world’s media?: media concentration and ownership around the world, Oxford University Press, 2016

Ofcom (2022), Media plurality and online news. Discussion document, 16 November 2022

Ofcom (2021), Statement: the future of media plurality in the UK, 17 November 2021

OECD (2021), Competition issues concerning news media and digital platforms, OECD Competition Committee Discussion Paper, 2021

P.L. Parcu (2019), New digital threats to media pluralism in the information age, EUI RSCAS, 2019/19

R.G. Picard, C. Dal Zotto (2016), The dimension of ownership and control of media, in P. Valcke, M. Sükösd, R.G. Picard (eds.), “Media pluralism and diversity: concepts, risks and global trends”, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016

A. Prat (2020), Measuring and Protecting Media Plurality in the Digital Age: A Political Economy Approach, 10 August 2020

J. Schlosberg (2017), Media ownership and agenda control: the hidden limits of the information age, Routledge, 2017

T.J. Seipp, N. Helberger, C. de Vreese, J. Ausloos (2024), Between the cracks: Blind spots in regulating media concentration and platform dependence in the EU, in “Internet Policy Review”, vol. 13, 2024, n. 4

M. Sznajder (2024), Biting More Than It Can Chew. On the The EMFA’s Media Pluralism Test, Blogpost for Verfassungblog, 16 July 2024

Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms (2019), Final Report, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 20 January, 2025

Stigler Media Subcommittee (2019), Protecting journalism in the age of digital platforms, 16 September 2019

P. Valcke, M. Sükösd, R.G. Picard (eds.) (2016), Media pluralism and diversity: concepts, risks and global trends, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016

Pubblicato

2025-07-02

Fascicolo

Sezione

Sezione monografica - EMFA Under the Spotlight - Parte II

Come citare

[1]
Carlini, R. 2025. Potere di mercato e controllo dell’opinione pubblica. La valutazione dei rischi per il pluralismo e l’indipendenza editoriale derivanti dalla concentrazione proprietaria. Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto. 7, 1 (Jul. 2025), 12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0228.