Ethical integration of AI in judicial systems: Advancing fairness, transparency, and judicial efficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0256Keywords:
AI in Justice Systems, AI Ethics, Fairness, Transparency in AI, Judicial EfficiencyAbstract
This study assesses the perceived role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in advancing judicial reform in Albania, with emphasis on efficiency, fairness, and transparency. A survey of 340 students in law, computer science, and computer engineering was analysed using Spearman’s rank correlation to explore how perceived benefits and risks relate to support for AI in justice processes. The findings show a balanced view. Students acknowledge AI’s potential to reduce delays and improve administrative coordination, yet they also express concerns about bias, limited transparency, and relying on automated tools in decisions that affect fundamental rights. They emphasise the need for clear rules, explainable systems, and strong human oversight to ensure responsible use. This research makes a pioneering contribution to understanding how future legal professionals perceive AI in transitional judicial systems, introducing an AI-Driven Justice System Framework based on the study’s findings.
References
A.D. Reiling (2020), Courts and artificial intelligence, in “International Journal for Court Administration”, vol. 11, 2020, n. 2
S. Barocas, A.D. Selbst (2016), Big Data’s Disparate Impact, in “California Law Review”, vol. 104, 2016, n. 3
D. Barysė, R. Sarel (2024), Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated?, in “Artificial Intelligence and Law”, vol. 32, 2024, n. 1
F. Bex (2025), AI, Law and beyond. A transdisciplinary ecosystem for the future of AI & Law, in “Artificial Intelligence and Law”, vol. 33, 2025
F. Contini, A. Minissale, S. Bergman Blix (2024), Artificial intelligence and real decisions: predictive systems and generative AI vs. emotive-cognitive legal deliberations, in “Frontiers in Sociology”, vol. 9, 2024
F. Contini, E.A. Ontanu, M. Velicogna (2024), AI Accountability in Judicial Proceedings: An Actor-Network Approach, in “Laws”, vol. 13, 2024, n. 6
F. Dakalbab, M.A. Talib, O.A. Waraga et al. (2022), Artificial intelligence & crime prediction: A systematic literature review, in “Social Sciences & Humanities Open”, vol. 6, 2022, n. 1
F. Di Porto, P. Fantozzi, M. Naldi, N. Rangone (2024), Mining EU consultations through AI, in “Artificial Intelligence and Law”, 2024
e-Estonia (2022), Introducing Salme, Estonian courts’ speech recognition assistant, in e-“estonia.com”, 26 January 2022
C. Engel, L. Linhardt, M. Schubert (2025), Code is law: how COMPAS affects the way the judiciary handles the risk of recidivism, in “Artificial Intelligence and Law”, vol. 33, 2025
European Commission (2024), Rule of Law Report: Country Chapter on the Rule of Law Situation in Albania, SWD(2024) 828, 2024
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2024), Report European judicial systems - CEPEJ Evaluation report - 2024 Evaluation cycle (2022 data), Council of Europe, 2024
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2024-a), CEPEJ ICT Index, 2024
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2018), European ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and their environment, Council of Europe, 2018
J. Farrell (2024), An introduction to Codes of Practice for the AI Act, 3 July 2024, in EU Artificial Intelligence Act
A. Ferhataj, F. Memaj, R. Sahatcija et al. (2025), Ethical concerns in AI development: analyzing students’ perspectives on robotics and society, in “Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society”, vol. 23, 2025, n.2
D. Fernández-Llorca, E. Gómez, I. Sánchez, G. Mazzini (2025), An interdisciplinary account of the terminological choices by EU policymakers ahead of the final agreement on the AI Act: AI system, general purpose AI system, foundation model, and generative AI, in “Artificial Intelligence and Law”, vol. 33, 2025
M. Gamito Cantero, G. Gentile (2023), Algorithms, rule of law, and the future of justice - Implications in the Estonian justice system, European University Institute, STG, Policy Brief, 2023/27, 2023
S. Gless (2023), Could Robot Judges Believe? Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial as we approach the Digital Age: A Comment on Sarah Summers «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof, and Rights», in “Quaestio Facti. Revista Internacional Sobre Razonamiento Probatorio”, vol. 5, 2023
Ł. Górski, B. Kuźniacki, M. Almada et al. (2025), Exploring explainable AI in the tax domain, in “Artificial Intelligence and Law”, vol. 33, 2025
L. Held, I. Habernal (2024), LaCour!: enabling research on argumentation in hearings of the European Court of Human Rights, in “Artificial Intelligence and Law”, 2024
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2019), Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, European Commission, 2019
I. Ilin, A. Kelli (2024), Natural Language, Legal Hurdles: Navigating the Complexities in Natural Language Processing Development and Application, in “Journal of the University of Latvia. Law”, vol. 17, 2024
V. Laptev, D. Feyzrakhmanova (2024), Application of Artificial Intelligence in Justice: Current Trends and Future Prospects, in “Human-Centric Intelligent Systems”, vol. 4, 2024, n. 3
J.-S. Lee (2025), InstructPatentGPT: training patent language models to follow instructions with human feedback, in “Artificial Intelligence and Law”, vol. 33, 2025
A.D. Lovie (1995), Who discovered Spearman’s rank correlation?, in “British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology”, vol. 48, 1995, n. 2
P. Marshall (2022), Scandal at the Post Office: The intersection of law, ethics and politics, in “Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review”, vol. 19, 2022
O. Metsker, E. Trofimov, G. Kopanitsa (2021), Application of Machine Learning for E-justice, in “Journal of Physics: Conference Series”, vol. 1828, 2021
P.M. Nowotko (2021), AI in judicial application of law and the right to a court, in “Procedia Computer Science”, vol. 192, 2021
P. Perrot (2017), What about AI in criminal intelligence? From predictive policing to AI perspectives, in “European Police Science and Research Bulletin”, 2017
S. Schweitzer, M. Conrads (2025), The digital transformation of jurisprudence: an evaluation of ChatGPT-4’s applicability to solve cases in business law, in “Artificial Intelligence and Law”, vol. 33, 2025
R. Simmons (2018), Big Data, Machine Judges, and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Justice System, in “University of California Davis Law Review”, vol. 52, 2018
K. Szkalej, M. Senftleben (2024), Generative AI and Creative Commons Licences - The Application of Share Alike Obligations to Trained Models, Curated Datasets and AI Output, in “Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law”, vol. 15, 2024, n. 3
A. Wallace, J. Goodman-Delahunty (2021), Measuring trust and confidence in courts, in “International Journal for Court Administration”, vol. 12, 2021, n. 3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












rivistariidATigsg.cnr.it