Measures for the metering of telephone calls and the interception of telecommunications in criminal proceedings: Legal aspects and implications for human rights and public safety – The case of Kosovo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0279Keywords:
Metering of telephone calls, Interception of telecommunications, Right to privacy, Public safety, Human rightsAbstract
This paper deals with the measures of metering of telephone calls and interception of telecommunications in Kosovo, in particular the legal framework, as well as the impact they have on human rights and public safety. From the study of domestic legislation, ECHR standards, and ECtHR jurisprudence, it is evident that investigative measures should be applied only when there are no other less intrusive means to achieve the same goal. The paper deals with the content of the standards of Directive 2014/41/EU on the European Investigation Order, assessing that, although Kosovo has no formal obligations towards it, as it is in the pre-accession phase, the harmonization of its legislation in this field with European standards is necessary. The results of this study show that, although these measures are necessary for the fight against organized crime and the strengthening of public safety, they carry real risks for fundamental rights, in particular the right to privacy, freedom of expression, and freedom of thought. Their misuse can damage citizens’ trust in state institutions and violate the essence of guaranteed rights. In conclusion, it is recommended to strengthen judicial oversight, increase institutional transparency, and harmonize Kosovo’s legislation with international standards.
References
I. Armada (2015), The European Investigation Order and the lack of European standards for gathering evidence: is a fundamental rights-based refusal the solution?, in “New Journal of European Criminal Law”, vol. 6, 2015, n. 1
J. Barbosa e Silva (2019), The speciality rule in cross-border evidence gathering and in the European Investigation Order – let’s clear the air, in “Era Forum”, vol. 19, 2019, n. 3
A. Conte (2010), Special Investigative Techniques and Rules of Criminal Procedure, in “Human Rights in the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism”, Springer, 2010
C. Devery (2010), Criminal Profiling and Criminal Investigation, in “Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice”, vol. 26, 2010, n. 4
R. Flor, B. Panattoni (2023), Digital criminal investigations in Italy. The intersection between data protection and cybersecurity, in “New Journal of European Criminal Law”, vol. 14, 2023, n. 4
E. Hasani, I. Čukalović (2013), Commentary: Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, GIZ, 2013
C. Heard, D. Mansell (2011), The European Investigation Order: Changing the Face of Evidence-Gathering in EU Cross-Border Cases, in “New Journal of European Criminal Law”, vol. 2, 2011, n. 4
B. Keenan (2025), From interception to integration: encryption, bulk data, and the investigatory powers regime, in “King’s Law Journal”, vol 36, 2025, n. 3
E.R. Maguire, W.R. King (2013), Transferring criminal investigation methods from developed to developing nations, in “Policing and Society”, vol. 23, 2013, n. 3
E. Sahiti, R. Murati, Xh. Elshani (2014), Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code, GIZ, 2014
N. Selvadurai, N. Kisswani, Y. Khalaileh, (2016), The proportionality principle in telecommunications interception and access law in an environment of heightened security and technological convergence, in “Information & Communications Technology Law”, vol. 25, 2016, n. 3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












