Il tool ACOI per lo screening del conflitto d’interessi e il gap italiano da colmare nei sistemi AI di prevenzione della corruzione
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0283Keywords:
Anti-corruption, Artificial intelligence, Conflict of interest, Automated screening, ACOIAbstract
The ACOI tool for conflict-of-interest screening and the Italian gap to be closed in AI-based corruption prevention systems
This article examines, through the case study of the PNRR project “ACOI – Assessing Conflicts of Interest”, the conditions that would make an AI-based conflict-of-interest prevention system operationally viable in Italy. ACOI — developed in partnership by the University of Perugia and Transcrime (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), in collaboration with the Ministry of the Interior — empirically tested an automated screening tool on 485 public managers, cross-referencing data from the National Population Register, the Companies Register, the Land Registry, and Orbis, confirming the model’s feasibility. The analysis identifies the enabling conditions still required for the transition to systematic operation: legislative designation of authorised data sources and specification of AI-based processing under the functional legality standard (Art. 2-ter Privacy Code); structured access through the National Digital Data Platform (PDND); and compliance with AI Act requirements for high-risk systems, including embedded pseudonymisation and meaningful human oversight. The conclusion — also from a comparative perspective — is that Italy’s gap is not technological but normative and organisational, and that closing it is an obligation imposed by Directive (EU) 2026/1021 on the prevention and combating of corruption.
References
ANAC (2013), Piano Nazionale Anticorruzione, 2013
APEC Policy Support Unit (2025), Technologies for Preventing, Detecting, and Combating Corruption, Issues Paper No. 15, 2025
N. Appelman, R. Ó Fathaigh, J. van Hoboken (2021), Social Welfare, Risk Profiling and Fundamental Rights: The Case of SyRI in the Netherlands, in “Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law”, vol. 12, 2021, n. 4
E. Ash, S. Galletta, T. Giommoni (2025), A Machine Learning Approach to Analyze and Support Anticorruption Policy, in “American Economic Journal: Economic Policy”, vol. 17, 2025, n. 2
Banca d’Italia, Unità di Informazione Finanziaria per l’Italia (2026), Quaderno Statistiche – Segnalazioni di operazioni sospette (SOS), secondo semestre 2025, 2026
Banca d’Italia, Unità di Informazione Finanziaria per l’Italia (2025), Rapporto annuale per il 2024, n. 17, 2025
BBC News (2018), A digital game or a powerful weapon against boardroom crime?, 3 settembre 2018
F. Calderoni, M.C. Pollicino, B. Ponti, S. Valle (2026), Applicazione di un modello di screening automatico e validazione qualitativa del rischio potenziale di conflitto di interessi, Studio condotto da Transcrime – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore nell’ambito del Progetto ACOI (Assessing conflicts of interest), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2026
Commissione europea (2023), Nota metodologica Arachne, versione 3.2, 2023
Controladoria-Geral da União (2022), Alice: Desafios, resultados e perspectivas da ferramenta de auditoria contínua de compras públicas governamentais com uso de inteligência artificial, in “Revista da CGU”, vol. 14, 2022, n. 26
EDPB (2024), Opinion 28/2024 on certain data protection aspects related to the processing of personal data in the context of AI models, 17 dicembre 2024
EDPB (2018), Guidelines 01/2018 on automated individual decision-making and profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679 (ex WP251rev.01), Version 2.0, 6 febbraio 2018
EDPB-EDPS (2021), Joint Opinion 5/2021 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act), 18 giugno 2021
FAO (2024), Global Forest Observations Initiative (GFOI), GFOI Forest Foresight – Predicting deforestation, 2024
J. Gallego, G. Rivero, J. Martínez (2021), Preventing rather than punishing: An early warning model of malfeasance in public procurement, in “International Journal of Forecasting”, vol. 37, 2021, n. 1
M. Gerhold, J. Lauenstein (2022), Litauens Ethikkommission als Datenschutzverletzerin: Nordische Transparenz und europarechtlicher Datenschutz, in “Europarecht”, vol. 67, 2022, n. 6
C. Gerli (2026), Artificial Intelligence in Anti-Corruption. Comparative Insights from Public Procurement across the EU, Tesi di dottorato, Università di Bologna, 2026
GIZ (2024), Inspector AI tackles money laundering, 25 marzo 2024
Global Fishing Watch (2022), Global analysis shows where fishing vessels’ identification switched off, 1 novembre 2022
GOV.UK (2025), Initial findings of our e-discovery review, 2 febbraio 2025
F. Jacques (2023), Protection des données à caractère personnel: la Cour de justice a-t-elle transformé le RGPD en un instrument d’une sensibilité extrême? Note d’observations sous CJUE (GC), 1er août 2022, C-184/20 (OT), in “Revue du Droit des Technologies de l’information”, vol. 91, 2023, n. 2
E. Katona, M. Fazekas (2024), Hidden barriers to open competition: Using text mining to uncover corrupt restrictions to competition in Hungarian public procurement, GTI Working Paper 2024:01, Government Transparency Institute, 2024
N. Köbis, C. Starke, I. Rahwan (2022), The promise and perils of using artificial intelligence to fight corruption, in “Nature Machine Intelligence”, vol. 4, 2022, n. 5
A. Longobucco, J. Ferwerda (2025), Fighting Corruption with Artificial Intelligence: Searching for Suitable Public Procurement Data in the EU, BridgeGap Working Paper 25-01, 2025
G. Mancini Palamoni (2024), Il paradigma digitale dell’evidenza pubblica, in “Ceridap”, 2024, n. 2
F. Odilla (2025), The Digitalisation of Anti-Corruption in Brazil: Scandals, Reforms, and Innovation, Routledge, 2025
F. Odilla (2023), Bots against corruption: Exploring the benefits and limitations of AI-based anti-corruption technology, in “Crime, Law and Social Change”, 2023
F. Odilla, A. Mattoni (2023), Unveiling the layers of data activism: The organising of civic innovation to fight corruption in Brazil, in “Big Data & Society”, vol. 10, 2023
OECD (2026), Anti-Corruption and Integrity Outlook 2026, OECD Publishing, 2026
OECD (2025-a), AI in fighting corruption and promoting public integrity, in Governing with Artificial Intelligence, OECD Publishing, 2025
OECD (2025-b), Using digital technology to strengthen oversight of public procurement in Portugal: The use of data analytics and machine learning by the Tribunal de Contas, OECD Publishing, 2025
OECD (2024-a), Strengthening Oversight of the Court of Auditors for Effective Public Procurement in Portugal: Digital Transformation and Data-Driven Risk Assessments, OECD Publishing, 2024
OECD (2024-b), Generative AI for anti-corruption and integrity in government: Taking stock of promise, perils and practice, OECD Publishing, 2024
OECD (2019), Analytics for Integrity: Data-Driven Approaches for Enhancing Corruption and Fraud Risk Assessments, OECD Publishing, 2019
Open Contracting Partnership (2024), Red Flags in Public Procurement: A Guide to Using Data to Detect and Mitigate Risks, 2024
OpenText (2018), UK Serious Fraud Office Selects OpenText to Expedite Data Discovery and Investigations, 10 aprile 2018
F.S. Paolo, D. Kroodsma, J. Raynor, T. Hochberg, P. Davis, J. Cleary, L. Marsaglia, S. Orofino, C. Thomas, P. Halpin (2024), Satellite mapping reveals extensive industrial activity at sea, in “Nature”, vol. 625, 2024, n. 7993
I. Parvanova (2025), The use of big data by anti-corruption authorities, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute, 2025
B. Ponti (2026), Verifica del conflitto di interessi e prevenzione della corruzione. Il nodo del trattamento dei dati personali, in E. Carloni (a cura di), “Abuso di potere e pubblica amministrazione. Integrazione ed effettività dell’anticorruzione tra prevenzione e repressione”, Il Mulino, 2026, in corso di pubblicazione
B. Ponti (2025), Trattamento dei dati personali e standard di legalità: elementi di preminenza delle esigenze di circolazione?, in “Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto”, 2025, n. 2
B. Ponti (2023-a), Attività amministrativa e trattamento dei dati personali. Gli standard di legalità tra tutela e funzionalità, FrancoAngeli, 2023
B. Ponti (2023-b), Tre scenari di digitalizzazione amministrativa «complessa»: dalla interoperabilità predicata alla standardizzazione praticata, in “Istituzioni del federalismo”, 2023, n. 3
B. Ponti (2022), Le diverse declinazioni della “Buona amministrazione” nel PNRR, in “Istituzioni del federalismo”, 2022, n. 2
B. Ponti (2019-a), La mediazione informativa nel regime giuridico della trasparenza: spunti ricostruttivi, in “Il diritto dell’informazione e dell’informatica”, 2019, n. 2
B. Ponti (2019-b), Il luogo adatto dove bilanciare. Il «posizionamento» del diritto alla riservatezza e alla tutela dei dati personali vs il diritto alla trasparenza nella sentenza n. 20/2019, in “Istituzioni del federalismo”, 2019, n. 2
A. Rachovitsa, N. Johann (2022), The Human Rights Implications of the Use of AI in the Digital Welfare State: Lessons Learned from the Dutch SyRI Case, in “Human Rights Law Review”, vol. 22, 2022, n. 2
M. Resimić (2025), Harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) for anti-corruption. Benefits and challenges in prevention, detection and investigation, U4 Helpdesk Answer 2025:24, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute, 2025
M. Rusinov (2025), The Use of Network Analysis for the Detection of Corruption in Public Procurement: The Bulgarian Case as a Testing Ground, in “Public Policies.bg”, vol. 16, 2025, n. 2
South China Morning Post (2019), China’s corruption-busting AI system ‘Zero Trust’, 4 febbraio 2019
I. Tello Arista, M. Fazekas, A. Volkotrub (2026), Using Beneficial Ownership Data for Systematic Risk Assessment in Public Procurement. The Example of 6 European Countries, in “European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research”, 2026
U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre (2023), Unlocking AI’s potential in anti-corruption: Hype vs. reality, 2023
WP29 – Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2014), Opinion 05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques, WP216, 0829/14/EN, 10 aprile 2014
WP29 – Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2013), Opinion 03/2013 on purpose limitation, WP 203, 2 aprile 2013
WWF Netherlands (2022), Forest Foresight Prospectus, 2022
D. Zinnbauer (2025), Artificial intelligence in anti-corruption – a timely update on AI technology, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute, U4 Brief 2025:1, 2025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












